The two essays are only on the point of view. It is natural to use objects to speak of will than to use objects to describe a woman. For other things, based on this idea, another article will be lost.
Next, looking at the handwriting, the words in the other essay are indeed indistinguishable from the words circulated by Wesley Ling. But Wesley Ling is busy with official business, and it has been a long time since a new manuscript has been circulated. Comparing the two, although the general framework does not seem to have changed much, it is clear at a glance who has the better character.
In other words, it can be seen that Wesley Ling’s handwriting has made very obvious progress, which seems to be a comparison between the past and the present of a person.
From this point of view, it is not credible to say that it is not a counterfeit or a premeditated counterfeit.
“This handwriting is for you. Let’s hang it with the other one.” Wesley Ling threw the brush back on the table domineeringly, carrying his hands on his back, and left with Shi Shiran, two “followers”.
Login to comment
Be the first one to comment...