Professor Miller released new research results and the paper was published in a sub-journal of a top journal.
There is a gap in the quality of the journals where he and Scarlett Ran published papers, but they also have other advantages. For example, the review time from submission to publication is short.
Generally, before an important discovery or result is made, the industry will hear about it, but there was no news at all about Professor Miller's announcement this time.
It had just been a month since Scarlett Ran's paper was published. The two of them had the same research direction, but published completely different conclusions. It was obvious that one of the two people's views must be problematic.
If Scarlett Ran took Professor Miller's path, it would definitely not work. But Professor Miller's paper also passed the review, proving that there was no problem with the data.
Login to comment
Be the first one to comment...