Saijin's technical standards are actually not very good. The reason why it won the first place is because other companies' score deductions were quite severe.
GAD's water drop is not practical, the podium tower has no bright spots, and the plan and elevation do not match up, so points are deducted; Sino-Ocean's technical mark does not have any bright spots, and points are deducted everywhere; the towers in Group F gain 1 point, and the display area and podium , incorrect drawings and landscape, all points will be deducted.
Group K's podium and tower were each given two points, and the drawings were incorrect and deducted two points. It looked like it should have been the unit with the highest score, but in fact it was the lowest among the 10 houses, and it was ridiculously low. Regarding this, the committee member They gave a heartbreaking answer.
The chicken coop is slightly more similar to a built exhibition hall abroad. After repeated consultations, the committee only gave it a passing grade.
This result was relayed by Miles. She herself did not express any opinion on it, but Qian Xin had only one feeling after hearing it, and that was ridiculous ------ Since it was plagiarism, such a bad act should not be cancelled. He didn't agree with the qualifications, so why should he give it a passing mark! Where is the very similar pavilion? The designer said he plagiarized it. Do you want to sue him for infringement?
Login to comment
Be the first one to comment...